# Technical Due Diligence: What to Check Before Acquiring Software — Hunchbite

> A comprehensive checklist for evaluating software before an acquisition, investment, or major partnership — covering code quality, architecture, security, scalability, and hidden risks.

Source: https://hunchbite.com/guides/technical-due-diligence

[Home](https://hunchbite.com/)/[Guides](https://hunchbite.com/guides)/[Rescuing Software](https://hunchbite.com/guides/topic/fix-my-software)/Technical Due Diligence: What to Check Before Acquiring Software

[Rescuing Software](https://hunchbite.com/guides/topic/fix-my-software)

# Technical Due Diligence: What to Check Before Acquiring Software

A comprehensive checklist for evaluating software before an acquisition, investment, or major partnership — covering code quality, architecture, security, scalability, and hidden risks.

By HunchbiteFebruary 7, 202611 min read

due diligenceacquisitioncode audit

> **What is technical due diligence?** Technical due diligence is an independent assessment of a software product's codebase, architecture, infrastructure, and team capabilities — typically conducted before an acquisition, investment, or major engagement. It reveals hidden risks: technical debt, security vulnerabilities, scalability limitations, and dependency on key personnel. The findings directly impact valuation, negotiation terms, and post-acquisition planning.

You're about to acquire a company, invest in a startup, or take over a software product. The financials check out. The market opportunity is real. The team seems strong.

But what about the software itself?

Technical due diligence answers a critical question: **Is the technology an asset or a liability?** A product with strong financials can hide a codebase that costs more to maintain than it generates. An impressive demo can mask fundamental architecture problems that prevent scaling.

This guide is the checklist we use when clients ask us to evaluate software before acquisition.

## Due diligence by deal type

The core checks below apply to every deal. What you weight most depends on what you're buying. Start here if you already know the deal type:

* **Need the short version?** The [technical due diligence checklist](https://hunchbite.com/guides/technical-due-diligence-checklist) is a one-page list you can hand to your team.
* **Buying a small SaaS business:** [technical due diligence for micro SaaS acquisitions](https://hunchbite.com/guides/technical-due-diligence-micro-saas).
* **Buying a larger SaaS company:** [technical due diligence for a SaaS acquisition](https://hunchbite.com/guides/tech-due-diligence-saas-acquisition).
* **Buying a mobile app:** [technical due diligence for mobile apps](https://hunchbite.com/guides/technical-due-diligence-mobile-app).
* **Buying a marketplace:** [technical due diligence for marketplaces](https://hunchbite.com/guides/technical-due-diligence-marketplace).
* **Buying enterprise software:** [technical due diligence for enterprise software](https://hunchbite.com/guides/technical-due-diligence-enterprise-software).
* **Acquiring a company's internal tools:** [technical due diligence for internal tools](https://hunchbite.com/guides/technical-due-diligence-internal-tools).
* **Acquiring a team, not a product:** [technical due diligence for an acquihire](https://hunchbite.com/guides/technical-due-diligence-acquihire).

If you'd rather have someone run the checks for you, our [technical due diligence service](https://hunchbite.com/technical-due-diligence) delivers a written report with risk levels and remediation costs.

## Why technical due diligence matters

### The cost of getting it wrong

* **Rebuilding a codebase** post-acquisition typically costs 50–100% of the original development investment
* **Security vulnerabilities** can result in data breaches, regulatory fines, and destroyed customer trust
* **Scalability limitations** can cap growth regardless of market demand
* **Technical debt** can consume 40–60% of engineering capacity, turning a productive team into a maintenance crew

Technical issues discovered post-acquisition reduce your negotiating power to zero. Discovered during due diligence, they're leverage points for better terms or deal structure.

## The due diligence checklist

### Category 1: Architecture

| Check                    | What to look for                                                 | Red flag                                               |
| ------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------ |
| System design            | Clear separation of frontend, backend, database, services        | Monolithic spaghetti with no boundaries                |
| API design               | RESTful or GraphQL with consistent patterns, versioning          | No API documentation, inconsistent endpoints           |
| Data flow                | Clear, traceable path from user action to data storage           | Data flowing through 7 services for a simple operation |
| Scalability              | Architecture can handle 10x current load with reasonable changes | Architecture requires complete redesign to scale       |
| Third-party dependencies | Reasonable use of external services with fallback plans          | Critical business logic dependent on a single vendor   |

**Key question:** "Can this system handle 10x the current user base without a rewrite?"

### Category 2: Code quality

| Check         | What to look for                                                                    | Red flag                                             |
| ------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------- |
| Readability   | Clear naming, consistent style, reasonable complexity                               | Cryptic variable names, 1000-line functions          |
| Organization  | Logical file structure, clear module boundaries                                     | Files named utils2.js, helpers\_old.js, temp\_fix.js |
| Duplication   | DRY code, shared utilities, reusable components                                     | Copy-pasted blocks throughout the codebase           |
| Documentation | README with setup instructions, architecture docs, inline comments on complex logic | Zero documentation, no README                        |
| Standards     | Linting configured and passing, consistent formatting                               | No linter, mixed tabs and spaces, no code standards  |

**Key question:** "Can a new senior developer be productive in this codebase within 2 weeks?"

### Category 3: Security

| Check                      | What to look for                                                 | Red flag                                                           |
| -------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------ |
| Dependency vulnerabilities | npm audit / equivalent shows zero critical issues                | Critical CVEs in production dependencies                           |
| Authentication             | Industry-standard auth (bcrypt, OAuth, JWT with proper handling) | Passwords in plain text, custom crypto, sessions that never expire |
| Authorization              | Role-based access enforced at API level, not just UI             | Hiding buttons in the UI but not checking permissions server-side  |
| Data protection            | Encryption at rest for sensitive data, HTTPS everywhere          | PII stored in plain text, HTTP endpoints                           |
| Secrets management         | Environment variables or secrets manager                         | API keys hardcoded in source code, committed to git                |
| Input validation           | Server-side validation on all user inputs                        | Client-side only validation, raw SQL with string concatenation     |

**Key question:** "If this codebase were audited by a security firm tomorrow, would they find critical vulnerabilities?"

### Category 4: Infrastructure and operations

| Check        | What to look for                              | Red flag                                           |
| ------------ | --------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------- |
| Hosting      | Managed, documented, accessible               | "Only John knows the server password"              |
| CI/CD        | Automated testing and deployment pipeline     | Manual FTP deployments                             |
| Environments | Separate dev, staging, production             | Production is the only environment                 |
| Monitoring   | Error tracking, uptime monitoring, alerting   | No monitoring, "we find out when users report"     |
| Backups      | Automated database backups, tested recovery   | No backups, or backups that have never been tested |
| Logging      | Structured logging with appropriate retention | console.log statements or no logging at all        |

**Key question:** "If the production server crashes at 3 AM, how quickly can the system recover?"

### Category 5: Test coverage

| Check             | What to look for                                    | Red flag                                       |
| ----------------- | --------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------- |
| Unit tests        | Critical business logic has unit tests              | Zero unit tests                                |
| Integration tests | Core user flows are tested end-to-end               | No integration testing                         |
| Test reliability  | Tests pass consistently, run in CI                  | Flaky tests, tests disabled, test suite broken |
| Coverage metric   | 40%+ coverage on critical paths (not vanity metric) | 0% coverage or only trivial tests              |

**Key question:** "How confident is the team that a code change won't break something unrelated?"

### Category 6: Team and knowledge

| Check      | What to look for                                        | Red flag                                                         |
| ---------- | ------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Bus factor | Multiple developers understand each major component     | One person is the only one who can deploy or fix critical issues |
| Onboarding | New developer can set up and run the project in < 1 day | Setup takes a week and requires help from specific team members  |
| Hiring     | Technology stack has a large talent pool                | Niche technology with few available developers                   |
| Turnover   | Team has been stable for 12+ months                     | 3+ developers left in the past year                              |

**Key question:** "If the two most senior developers left tomorrow, how long before the team is productive again?"

### Category 7: Licensing and compliance

| Check                | What to look for                                                | Red flag                                                 |
| -------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------- |
| Open-source licenses | All dependencies have compatible licenses (MIT, Apache, BSD)    | GPL dependencies in proprietary code, or unlicensed code |
| Data compliance      | GDPR, CCPA, or relevant regulations are addressed               | No data deletion mechanism, no privacy controls          |
| Industry compliance  | Relevant standards met (PCI-DSS for payments, HIPAA for health) | Non-compliant handling of regulated data                 |
| IP ownership         | All code written under work-for-hire with proper contracts      | Ambiguous ownership, code from previous employers        |

**Key question:** "Are there any legal or compliance risks that could result in forced changes or penalties?"

Hunchbite Service

#### Technical Due Diligence

Independent technical assessment for investors, acquirers, and founders — a report you can put in front of a board.

[Request due diligence](https://hunchbite.com/technical-due-diligence)

## Scoring the results

Rate each category on a 1–5 scale:

| Score | Meaning                                         |
| ----- | ----------------------------------------------- |
| 5     | Excellent — asset to the acquisition            |
| 4     | Good — minor improvements needed                |
| 3     | Acceptable — significant investment required    |
| 2     | Poor — major overhaul needed, impacts valuation |
| 1     | Critical — could be a deal-breaker              |

**Total score interpretation:**

* **28–35:** Technology is a strong asset. Proceed with confidence.
* **21–27:** Technology is functional but needs investment. Factor improvement costs into the deal.
* **14–20:** Significant technical risk. Either negotiate a substantial discount or plan for a partial rebuild.
* **7–13:** Technology is a liability. Strongly consider whether the acquisition makes sense at the proposed price.

## How findings affect the deal

### Negotiation leverage

Every issue identified is a dollar amount that can be deducted from the asking price:

* Critical security vulnerability requiring immediate fix: ₹3L–₹10L
* No automated tests (will need to build): ₹5L–₹15L
* Architecture doesn't scale (will need partial rewrite): ₹10L–₹30L
* No CI/CD (will need to build): ₹2L–₹5L
* Key-person dependency (risk mitigation): ₹5L–₹20L

How much each finding can take off the asking price

Typical deduction per finding, on one scale. The security figure is per critical vulnerability.

* No CI/CD (will need to build)₹2L – ₹5L
* Critical security vulnerability requiring immediate fix₹3L – ₹10L
* No automated tests (will need to build)₹5L – ₹15L
* Key-person dependency (risk mitigation)₹5L – ₹20L
* Architecture doesn't scale (will need partial rewrite)₹10L – ₹30L

Source: the negotiation leverage list above.

Present findings with remediation cost estimates. This isn't about being adversarial — it's about accurate valuation.

### Deal structure options

Based on findings, you might propose:

* **Price reduction** proportional to remediation costs
* **Escrow holdback** released after issues are resolved
* **Retention bonuses** for key technical team members
* **Warranty period** where the seller fixes discovered issues
* **Walk away** if the technical risk exceeds the business opportunity

If the target is already under LOI and the clock is running, the fastest way to turn this checklist into a number you can negotiate with is to have an independent team run it —

[book a call and we'll scope the audit to your deal →](https://cal.com/hunchbite/discovery)

## The bottom line

Technical due diligence isn't optional for software acquisitions. The code is either an asset that generates value or a liability that consumes it. The difference between a ₹50L asset and a ₹50L liability can be invisible from the outside.

Invest 3–5 days in a proper audit. The cost is trivial compared to the cost of discovering problems after you've signed.

For acquisition-type-specific guidance, see: [technical due diligence for private equity](https://hunchbite.com/guides/technical-due-diligence-private-equity), [for B2B SaaS acquisitions](https://hunchbite.com/guides/technical-due-diligence-b2b-saas), [for investors](https://hunchbite.com/guides/technical-due-diligence-for-investors), [for e-commerce businesses](https://hunchbite.com/guides/technical-due-diligence-ecommerce), [for AI/ML products](https://hunchbite.com/guides/technical-due-diligence-ai-ml-products), and [for HR and payroll software](https://hunchbite.com/guides/technical-due-diligence-hr-payroll-software). If you're a seller preparing for diligence, see our [seller's guide](https://hunchbite.com/guides/sellers-guide-technical-due-diligence).

If you're a founder preparing your own technical foundation for a raise — rather than an investor evaluating a target — see [what investors look for in your technical team](https://hunchbite.com/guides/what-vcs-look-for-in-technical-team) and the [engineering checklist before Series A](https://hunchbite.com/guides/engineering-checklist-before-series-a).

---

## Need a technical due diligence audit?

Reading the checklist is useful. Having someone run it is better. Hunchbite conducts technical due diligence for acquisitions and investments — codebase, architecture, security, and a written report with risk levels and deal structure recommendations. We've assessed software across industries and deal sizes.

**[→ Technical Due Diligence Service](https://hunchbite.com/technical-due-diligence)**

Call [+91 90358 61690](tel:+919035861690) · [Book a free call](https://cal.com/hunchbite/discovery) · [Contact form](https://hunchbite.com/contact)

Ask an AI assistant about this guide: [ChatGPT](https://chatgpt.com/?q=Read%20https%3A%2F%2Fhunchbite.com%2Fguides%2Ftechnical-due-diligence%20and%20help%20me%20apply%20it%20to%20my%20situation.%20Answer%20my%20questions%20about%20it.&hints=search) · [Claude](https://claude.ai/new?q=Read%20https%3A%2F%2Fhunchbite.com%2Fguides%2Ftechnical-due-diligence%20and%20help%20me%20apply%20it%20to%20my%20situation.%20Answer%20my%20questions%20about%20it.) · [Perplexity](https://www.perplexity.ai/search?q=Read%20https%3A%2F%2Fhunchbite.com%2Fguides%2Ftechnical-due-diligence%20and%20help%20me%20apply%20it%20to%20my%20situation.%20Answer%20my%20questions%20about%20it.)

On this page

* [Due diligence by deal type](#due-diligence-by-deal-type)
* [Why technical due diligence matters](#why-technical-due-diligence-matters)
* [The cost of getting it wrong](#the-cost-of-getting-it-wrong)
* [The due diligence checklist](#the-due-diligence-checklist)
* [Category 1: Architecture](#category-1-architecture)
* [Category 2: Code quality](#category-2-code-quality)
* [Category 3: Security](#category-3-security)
* [Category 4: Infrastructure and operations](#category-4-infrastructure-and-operations)
* [Category 5: Test coverage](#category-5-test-coverage)
* [Category 6: Team and knowledge](#category-6-team-and-knowledge)
* [Category 7: Licensing and compliance](#category-7-licensing-and-compliance)
* [Scoring the results](#scoring-the-results)
* [How findings affect the deal](#how-findings-affect-the-deal)
* [Negotiation leverage](#negotiation-leverage)
* [Deal structure options](#deal-structure-options)
* [The bottom line](#the-bottom-line)
* [Need a technical due diligence audit?](#need-a-technical-due-diligence-audit)

Ask AI about this guide

* [Open in ChatGPT](https://chatgpt.com/?q=Read%20https%3A%2F%2Fhunchbite.com%2Fguides%2Ftechnical-due-diligence%20and%20help%20me%20apply%20it%20to%20my%20situation.%20Answer%20my%20questions%20about%20it.&hints=search)
* [Open in Claude](https://claude.ai/new?q=Read%20https%3A%2F%2Fhunchbite.com%2Fguides%2Ftechnical-due-diligence%20and%20help%20me%20apply%20it%20to%20my%20situation.%20Answer%20my%20questions%20about%20it.)
* [Open in Perplexity](https://www.perplexity.ai/search?q=Read%20https%3A%2F%2Fhunchbite.com%2Fguides%2Ftechnical-due-diligence%20and%20help%20me%20apply%20it%20to%20my%20situation.%20Answer%20my%20questions%20about%20it.)

FAQ

What is technical due diligence?

Technical due diligence is an independent assessment of a software product's codebase, architecture, infrastructure, and team capabilities — conducted before an acquisition, investment, or major engagement. It uncovers hidden risks like technical debt, security vulnerabilities, scalability limitations, and key-person dependencies that directly affect valuation and deal structure.

How long does a technical due diligence audit take?

A thorough technical due diligence audit typically takes 3–7 business days depending on the size and complexity of the codebase. A focused audit covering the highest-risk areas can be completed in 2–3 days. The output is a written report with findings, risk ratings, and remediation cost estimates.

What are the most common red flags in technical due diligence?

The most common red flags are: hardcoded API keys or secrets in the codebase, no automated tests or CI/CD pipeline, a single engineer who is the only person who can deploy or understands critical components (bus factor of 1), critical security vulnerabilities in dependencies, and architecture that cannot scale beyond the current user base without a full rewrite.

How do technical due diligence findings affect acquisition price?

Each finding with a remediation cost should be deducted from the acquisition price or structured as an escrow holdback. Common adjustments include: no automated tests (₹5L–₹15L deduction), critical security vulnerabilities (₹3L–₹10L per issue), architecture that won't scale (₹10L–₹30L), and key-person dependency risk (₹5L–₹20L). The overall technology quality can also compress the ARR multiple by 0.5–2x.

Do I need technical due diligence for a small acquisition?

Yes — the size of the acquisition doesn't reduce the risk. A small acquisition with a broken codebase can consume more engineering resources post-close than the purchase price. The cost of a technical audit is typically 0.1–0.5% of the deal value, making it one of the highest-ROI steps in any acquisition process.

Next step

## Run the checklist with someone who does this for a living.

We conduct technical due diligence for acquisitions and investments — codebase, architecture, security, scalability, and team risk — and deliver a written report with risk levels, remediation costs, and deal-structure recommendations. You walk into the negotiation knowing exactly what you're buying.

[Book a Free Call](https://cal.com/hunchbite/discovery)[Technical Due Diligence](https://hunchbite.com/technical-due-diligence)

Trusted by VMAC Industries, TKD Logistics, Astitva Jewellery & more. [See our recent work →](https://hunchbite.com/case-studies)

Fixed-price, no hourly billing · No obligation · We tell you upfront if we're not a fit

Continue Reading

[Rescuing SoftwareTechnical Due Diligence Checklist (Print & Use)A complete technical due diligence checklist covering architecture, code quality, security, infrastructure, testing, team risk, and legal compliance — ready to use for any software acquisition or investment.8 min read](https://hunchbite.com/guides/technical-due-diligence-checklist)

[Rescuing SoftwareThe Seller's Guide to Technical Due DiligenceHow to prepare your software for technical due diligence as a seller — what buyers will check, what kills deals, what to fix before access is granted, and how to present your technology confidently.11 min read](https://hunchbite.com/guides/sellers-guide-technical-due-diligence)

[All Guides](https://hunchbite.com/guides)