An honest guide to outsourcing software development to India — the real advantages, the real risks, how to find quality teams, and what to avoid. Written by a Bangalore-based studio.
Why do companies outsource to India? India is the world's largest software outsourcing destination, home to 5.8 million IT professionals and producing 1.5 million engineering graduates annually. Companies outsource to India primarily for cost efficiency (60–70% savings over US/UK rates), access to a deep talent pool, English language proficiency, and timezone advantages that enable "follow the sun" development. However, quality varies enormously — vendor selection is the single most important factor in outsourcing success.
We're going to do something unusual: an Indian software studio writing an honest guide about outsourcing to India. Not a sales pitch. Not "India is the best!" propaganda. The truth.
We're based in Bangalore. We've seen the entire ecosystem from the inside — the world-class studios, the body shops, the resume farms, and everything in between. Here's what you actually need to know.
India has 5.8 million IT professionals. Bangalore alone has more software developers than most European countries. This isn't hype — it's scale.
What this means practically: you can find specialists in almost any technology, at almost any experience level, relatively quickly. Need a team of 5 React developers who've built e-commerce platforms? In the US, that search takes months. In Bangalore, it takes weeks.
India is the world's second-largest English-speaking country. In the IT industry specifically, English is the working language — in meetings, documentation, Slack channels, and code comments.
Is it accent-free? No. Does it matter? Not for software development. If you can have a productive 30-minute technical discussion, the accent is irrelevant. And you can — we do it every day with clients in the US, UK, Australia, and Europe.
The headline number: Indian developers cost 60–70% less than US developers.
The real number: When you factor in management overhead, communication costs, and the occasional quality issue, the realistic savings are 40–60%. Still significant. Just not the 80% that budget-tier agencies promise.
See our complete rate comparison by country for exact numbers.
India is 9.5–12.5 hours ahead of the US. This is either a massive advantage or a massive headache, depending on how you structure it.
The advantage: Your evening is our morning. You send requirements at 6 PM EST, we work on it overnight, and you wake up to a pull request. This "follow the sun" model genuinely accelerates delivery.
The headache: Real-time communication is limited to a 3–4 hour window (your morning, our evening). If your project requires constant back-and-forth collaboration, this is painful.
What works: Projects with clear requirements and weekly milestones. Asynchronous communication (detailed written updates, recorded Loom videos, well-documented pull requests) instead of constant meetings.
This is the biggest risk of outsourcing to India, and most guides gloss over it.
The range in India goes from:
The problem: from the outside, categories 3 and 4 often look like categories 1 and 2. They have polished websites, impressive client logos (sometimes fabricated), and sales teams that say all the right things.
This is cultural, and it's real. In many Indian business contexts, saying "no" to a client is considered disrespectful. The result: your vendor agrees to unrealistic timelines, says they understand requirements they don't understand, and confirms they have skills they don't have.
How to counter this: Ask specific, testable questions. Not "can you build this?" but "walk me through how you'd architect the authentication system for this." Not "is this timeline feasible?" but "what are the biggest risks to this timeline?"
A common pattern: the senior architect demos during the sales process. After you sign, juniors do the actual work. The architect moves to the next sales pitch.
How to counter this: Meet the actual team who will write your code. Insist on it in the contract. And verify early — review the first week's code to see if it matches the quality level you were promised.
Even with good English, cultural communication differences exist:
How to counter this: Establish a culture of direct communication from day one. Ask specifically: "What's not going well?" and "What are you stuck on?" Make it safe to share bad news early.
Bangalore (Bengaluru): India's tech capital. Highest concentration of quality studios. Also the most expensive city for Indian talent. If your budget allows, Bangalore is the safest bet.
Pune: Strong tech ecosystem, slightly lower costs than Bangalore. Growing startup scene.
Hyderabad: Major IT hub with large enterprise presence. Good for teams with experience in larger systems.
Delhi NCR (Gurgaon/Noida): Large talent pool, diverse specializations. Quality is more variable — requires careful vetting.
1. Portfolio depth, not breadth A studio that's built 10 similar products is better than one that's built 100 different things. Look for depth in the specific type of software you need.
2. Process transparency Ask them to walk you through their development process. Good signs: specific tools, clear milestones, daily/weekly cadences. Bad signs: vague answers, "we're flexible," or "whatever works for you."
3. Code quality If you're technical, ask to review code from a past project (with their client's permission). If you're not, hire a technical advisor to evaluate. One hour of code review can save you months of pain.
4. Client references (non-Indian clients) Talk to their international clients specifically. Managing a project across timezones and cultures is different from local work. You want proof they've done it successfully.
5. Team stability India's IT industry has high attrition. Ask: "What's your team turnover rate?" and "What happens if my lead developer leaves mid-project?" Good studios have answers. Body shops shrug.
| Tier | Hourly Rate | What You Get | Risk Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| Premium studio | ₹50–₹90/hr | Senior team, strong process, fixed-price projects, ownership of outcomes | Low |
| Solid mid-tier | ₹30–₹55/hr | Good developers, reasonable process, some hand-holding needed | Medium |
| Body shop | ₹18–₹30/hr | Developers (not outcomes), you manage everything, quality varies | High |
| Budget/freelance | ₹10–₹18/hr | Warm bodies, minimal process, high rework probability | Very High |
Our honest recommendation: Budget ₹40–₹70/hr for a quality engagement. Below ₹30/hr, you're almost certainly sacrificing quality that you'll pay for later.
Don't commit to 6 months. Start with a 2–4 week defined project. Evaluate:
If the pilot goes well, expand. If it doesn't, you've lost weeks, not months.
We've rebuilt projects from budget vendors more times than we can count. The pattern is always the same: the client saved 60% on the build and then spent 150% of the original budget fixing it. Read about the real cost of bad software.
If nobody on your team can evaluate code quality, you're flying blind. Even a part-time technical advisor (4–8 hours/month) reviewing code at milestones can prevent disasters.
"Just build what's in the requirements" produces mediocre software. The best results come from developers who understand the business context — why this feature matters, who the users are, what success looks like. Share context generously.
Trying to manage every hour across a 10-hour timezone difference is exhausting for both sides. Trust the process, evaluate outputs at milestones, and save the detailed management for the weekly calls.
We're Hunchbite — a software studio in Bangalore. We work on a fixed-price, project-basis. You know the total cost before we start. We ship in under two weeks. You own everything.
If you're evaluating Indian outsourcing options, book a free discovery call. We'll tell you honestly whether we're the right fit — and if we're not, we'll point you in a better direction.
If this guide resonated with your situation, let's talk. We offer a free 30-minute discovery call — no pitch, just honest advice on your specific project.
Practical frameworks for managing remote and outsourced developers — communication cadences, tools, milestone structures, and the common mistakes that derail outsourced projects.
11 min readguideA clear comparison of nearshore, offshore, and onshore software development — real cost differences, timezone implications, communication trade-offs, and when each model works best.
11 min read